Skip to content

Crime Doesn’t Pay – But the Perks aren’t so Bad

Poor old Doug Vaughn got his prison sentence today.  Twelve years.  So sad, so sad.  KOB gives you the details of the crime and the sentencing.  

He did get the gig he wanted though.  Federal minimum security as opposed to State medium security  where all the regular criminals are  . . . murderers and rapists and such.  The judge was told that it would cost about $40,000 per year to keep 65 year old Vaughn locked up.  If he lives all 12 years of his sentence, it will cost the taxpayers about $500,000.  Guess we showed him how not to swindle us out of our money. 

I worked at the Vaughn company every so briefly when I first moved to Albuquerque.  I wanted to give real estate a go and after getting my license, I took a seat at the Vaughn company.  The qualifying broker, when hiring me,  told me  that they didn’t hire “just anybody” that walked in.  But I’m pretty sure that they did.  Why?  Not because they thought any particular newbie was going to sell any real estate.  That was doubtful. They wanted your desk fee.  I think it was about $45 per month to have a chair at a desk with a phone – crammed in with about 60 other desks with phones. 

I was also given the opportunity to work “floor duty.”  That is where I answered Vaughn’s incoming phone calls for free.  As in no compensation.  The idea was, it was supposed to generate leads for me.  That didn’t happen.   I was also supposed to be mentored by the qualifying broker while at the “office” working floor duty. That didn’t happen either.  Any questions that I asked the qualifying broker were brushed off, with him saying he didn’t have time for me..  He was too busy cherry picking all of the real leads that came in. 

And every now and then, I saw Doug Vaughn.  Any conversation with Doug Vaughn was one way. The message was always the same: 1. Doug Vaughn is a real estate god.  2. Try to emulate him as best  you can but know that you have no chance.  3. Pay your monthly desk fees on time or Doug Vaughn will take you to collections. What a pity this wonderful man ended up in prison. 




The Crime Victim’s Face


Aurora, Colorado . . . Oak Creek, Wisconsin . . . Tucson, Arizona. Blood and dead bodies everywhere. Everyone wants to see what the criminal-of-the-day looks like and to a lesser extent, know why he did it. Eventually the killer’s photo is posted everywhere and citizens intently study the image for signs of obvious evil. People like to think that, if the situation were to happen to them, they would immediately recognize the insane grin or the racist glower or the orange hair and then be smart enough get the hell out of out of Dodge . . . or something. Lamentably, criminals of the future refuse to be defined.

The very saddest part is that the criminal’s picture is the one we remember. Why? Because after the initial broadcast, it is then broadcast again. And again and again. And again and again. The deceased victims? The surviving victims? The heroes? The victims families? Not so much. Not at all really, after the first week or two.

And that is in the high profile crimes. When someone’s child is murdered in a robbery or a drug deal gone bad or for no apparent reason at all, the public will most likely see a photo or two of the killer, if he’s known, but no images whatsoever of the victim. That is wrong.

Why do these murderers’ faces need to be shown over and over again? I understand once or twice but to the point of a previously unknown felon’s face being burned into our brains? Created by that ubiquitous reality show – “the news”, which routinely turns criminals into celebrities.

If the victim happens to be famous already, like Gabrielle Giffords, that is another matter. Every moment of Ms. Giffords recovery was documented, which is fine. But when she was shot, there were other victims too. Some survived and some did not. If you are an everyday Joe, then it’s as if you were killed in a car crash . . . sad, but not so memorable.

My book, “Escaping the Arroyo” is about a crime not as renown as the ones above, but notorious just the same – in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The mugshot of convicted kidnapper/rapist/killer, Michael Guzman, landed on the front page many times. There would have been even more pictures but his attorney informed the court that cameras made him nervous. Contrast that with murder victim Julie Jackson, who’s beautiful face never made the front page at all. Recently, also in Albuquerque, another convicted murderer’s image, Michael Astorga, who always seemed to be smirking at the camera, dominated the media. Victim Jim McGrane’s photo was also shown, but again and even though he was a Bernalillo County Sheriff shot in the line of duty, not as often. As for pictures of Astorga’s second murder victim, Candido Martinez, they were few and far between.

My point is, yes, these horrible crimes are going to be discussed ad nauseum, but why is it the criminal’s face we remember? Reporting the evildoing is necessary but instead of repeatedly showing the murderer, how about showing the victims – not also, but instead . . . every time. In the case of the deceased victims, all they have left are their pictures and the memories they represent.

Welcome: People Who Follow Crime

Today I start my new crime blog.  I will be discussing everything to do with crime.  I will be reviewing crime books.  Promoting authors. Exploring police proceedures.  Looking at what’s going on in corrections and crimes around the world.  Please contact this blog is you have information to disburse.

Hello world!

Welcome to! This is your very first post. Click the Edit link to modify or delete it, or start a new post. If you like, use this post to tell readers why you started this blog and what you plan to do with it.

Happy blogging!